The Two Faces of DNA: Synthetic Story vs. Mother Nature’s Truth

Everything we’re taught or shown about biology especially DNA  is a man-made, synthetic version of something far more intelligent, fluid, and magical in Nature. The mainstream version of DNA is based on lab methods, models, and assumptions. But there’s another version one that lives and breathes with the rhythms of Mother Nature.

The Synthetic DNA Story: What We’re Told

You’ve seen the twisting ladder image of DNA a thousand times but did you know it’s never been photographed? Like with viruses, every image of DNA is computer-generated, often based on scanning electron microscope (SEM) models or chemical reconstructions.

We’re told that DNA is “isolated” in labs but if you look at the actual process, it’s hard to believe this is a true representation of a living molecule in its natural state. Here’s the basic process:

Brief DNA Isolation Procedure:

1. Break cells open with detergents like SDS to dissolve membranes.

2. Remove proteins using enzymes like proteinase K, and chemicals like phenol or chloroform.

3. Precipitate the DNA using cold ethanol or isopropanol, which causes it to clump.

4. Wash the DNA with 70% ethanol.

5. Dissolve it in TE buffer or sterile water.

This produces fragments of DNA, chemically treated and removed from its natural environment not a full, living molecule as it exists in your body. Yet we’re told this isolated version is “you”  your fate, your health, your identity.

You are not a faulty code.
You are not stuck with rigid, inherited problems.
You are not a victim of your DNA.

The Mother Nature Version: DNA as a Living Vortex

Now let’s shift to what DNA truly is when seen through Nature’s lens and not the lab bench.

DNA is not a fixed or isolated chemical blueprint. It’s better understood as a natural, spiral pattern that helps life organize itself. It exists in all living things and constantly responds to the world around it.

Its spiral shape mirrors vortices we see in water, wind, shells, and galaxies not just pretty patterns, but the way energy moves and flows in the natural world. DNA is shaped like this because it guides and transmits energy and information.

According to physicist Konstantin Meyl, DNA acts as a fractal antenna. It receives signals from nature sunlight, temperature, magnetism, food, sleep rhythms and sends signals back out. Your body uses this input to know when to repair, rest, or adapt.

This isn’t just theory. It’s how life actually works:

You’re not static.

You’re not broken.

You are dynamic, responsive, and adaptable.

Life energy  whether you call it chi, prana, aether, or the force moves through the spirals of your body, adjusting constantly to keep you in balance.

DNA is part of this greater system. It doesn’t control you. It works with you, like a living vortex antenna.

You Are the Signal

When you live in harmony with Nature  when you rise with the sun, eat what’s in season, rest when it’s dark, and move your body your DNA sings. It becomes finely tuned, not to fear or disease, but to life itself.

Final Thought

> DNA is not your destiny.
It’s a natural tool, shaped by light, sound, breath, and the Earth herself.
You are not a code. You are a conscious part of the living field.

Every image you’ve seen of DNA, or any molecule or atom, is computer-generated. Take, for example, this widely circulated image that is often presented as authentic—yet it’s a fabrication. While it looks convincing, it is not a direct photograph. Instead, it was created using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Here’s where it gets interesting: the frequencies detected are then processed by algorithms, which assign theoretical physical properties to them. In reality, no physical geometry of atoms or molecules is ever directly observed. The shapes and structures we associate with atoms and molecules are fabricated by these algorithms.

It’s important to note that no actual “physical” geometry is visible at such small scales. The entire model of molecular and atomic science, with its supposed physical structures, is built on manipulated data and theoretical assumptions. The result is that much of modern science, especially in molecular biology and atomic theory, is based not on direct observation, but on theoretical math.

This situation is concerning because it suggests that our understanding of reality is shaped by those who control the creation of these algorithms. At these scales, what we truly detect are frequencies, not particles, challenging the foundation of molecular biology.

This revelation is a profound exposure of a significant deception that impacts nearly every aspect of modern life.

Crick’s famous drawing of the DNA structure is a representation rather than a direct discovery of the physical molecule itself. The structure of DNA was proposed by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953, based on X-ray crystallography data from Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. However, the double-helix model was a theoretical interpretation, and many aspects of DNA’s function and structure were inferred rather than directly observed by Crick and Watson themselves.

The images we typically see of DNA, including the well-known double helix, are computer-generated or artist’s impressions. These renderings are based on scientific models, but the actual molecular structure is far too small to be seen directly with the naked eye or even through traditional microscopy at the time.

For further research on DNA, here are some helpful resources:

Scanning electron microscope

https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2012/dec/01/1

List of links for researching DNA:

Scientists still can’t directly see genes with electron microscopes, but combining the tool with the molecular scissors CRISPR/Cas9 has let researchers visualize genes being transcribed (illustrated) from DNA (blue) into RNA (red).

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/50-years-ago-genes-electron-microscopes

https://i.postimg.cc/GppsDLNs/dna-rothschild.jpg

Evidence Falsifying the Double Helix Model
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/12/1445/htm

Researchers can now collect and sequence DNA from the air. The presence of human DNA in nearly every sample from the study is “a major hurdle,” Barnes said. On one hand, it encouragingly shows that the detection method is sensitive, Barnes said. But “this could also suggest that airborne samples are particularly easy to contaminate with DNA from the research team, especially when mammals are the target of analysis,” he added.

https://www-livescience-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.livescience.com/amp/dna-collected-air.html

DNA does not exist:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/62gd23/dna_does_not_exist/

The new understanding of DNA that removes the idea of genes.

https://truthseeker.se/the-new-understanding-of-dna-that-removes-the-idea-of-genes

DNA DISCOVERY, EXTRACTION AND STRUCTURE. A CRITICAL REVIEW

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

DNA: the Double Helix or the Ribbon Helix?

https://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0104v2.pdf?

THE DNA STRUCTURE PUZZLES 1 – 23

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330010773_THE_DNA_STRUCTURE_PUZZLES_1_-_23

DNA is just a theoretical concept. The so-called indirect evidence of the existence and structure of DNA are just completely unsustainable interpretations. No one can prove that the bands of different sizes seen on gel electrophoresis are the expression of the existence of the hypothetical structure of what is claimed to be DNA.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22545-dna-imaged-with-electron-microscope-for-the-first-time
David and James explore how models, like DNA, are created and questioning this process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxEc0WgWrBY

Meyl: Junk DNA no Junk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCzy2O59BE0

DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Scientists Show

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18dna.html

I took 9 different DNA tests and here’s what I found

https://www.livescience.com/amp/63997-dna-ancestry-test-results-explained.html

Twins get ‘mystifying’ DNA ancestry test results
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isa5c1p6aC0

Rosalind Franklin’s contributions to virology
https://naturemicrobiologycommunity.nature.com/posts/18900-rosalind-franklin-s-contributions-to-virology

Genetics: Genome in Dissolution
https://telegra.ph/Genetics-Genome-in-Dissolution-11-01
Lizard comes back Jewish
https://www.tiktok.com/@officialtiktokscience/video/6960025155863055622?lang=en

The Amino Age and The New abNormal Doctors
https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/06/30/the-amino-age-and-the-new-abnormal-doctors/
The genome was considered to be the unchangeable blueprint of the human being, which is determined at the beginning of our life. Science must bid farewell to this idea. In reality, our genetic make-up is in a state of constant change
https://telegra.ph/Genetics-Genome-in-Dissolution-11-01

Crick’s Caduceus: Is DNA another Occult hoax of scientism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2geiVRoImSs

DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09553002.2011.538130