Every single image you see of DNA, or any other molecule or atom for that matter, is computer generated.
Here is a common example of what people who dispute the fabrication of DNA submit as proof, as an authentic image.
It looks real enough and it is claimed that this is a direct image but that is a lie.
This image was created using a scanning electron microscope.
If we look into the process of imaging for a scanning electron microscope we quickly find that it is a simulation of what they believe DNA looks like.
Scanning electron microscope
https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2012/dec/01/1
The process of electron and scanning microscopes with respect to atoms and molecules goes as follows.
A physical sample is hit with a powerful emf beam to it’s electromagnetic capacity whereby it stops accepting further charge.
The sample is then left to naturally discharge until it reaches its rest state.
An antenna records the process and by which is discerned it’s unique frequency at rest.
It is at this point that the algorithm is applied.
The algorithm assigns the theoretical physical property of the frequency.
No actual physical geometry of so called molecules and atoms is ever observed and that the entire concept of this physical geometry assigned to these various frequencies,
(the non-physical emf which is what they actually use to tell one fundamental element from another) is fabricated entirely by the algorithms.
It is impossible, so far, to directly image anything as a physical point in space at that size.
The entire model of molecular and atomic science, with respect to them having PHYSICAL geometry is being manipulated and controlled by those who create these algorithms.
He went on to say that nearly the entire field of science is driven no longer by the direct observation of natural phenomena but by theory based upon theoretical math and that the difference between whose papers are promoted and whose are not is determined by how many citations one accumulates by the process of “peer review” and not at all by what one can actually objectively prove with their theory.
He conceded that this is an extremely dangerous situation as our conception of reality is literally being programmed by whomever is creating these algorithms.
Ultimately all we truly detect at those scales are frequencies and not particles.
This of course destroys the entire model of molecular biology and atomic science.
This is a devastating exposure of a profoundly deep deception which affects nearly every aspect of our lives.
List of links for researching DNA:
Scientists still can’t directly see genes with electron microscopes, but combining the tool with the molecular scissors CRISPR/Cas9 has let researchers visualize genes being transcribed (illustrated) from DNA (blue) into RNA (red).
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/50-years-ago-genes-electron-microscopes
https://i.postimg.cc/GppsDLNs/dna-rothschild.jpg
Evidence Falsifying the Double Helix Model
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/12/1445/htm
Researchers can now collect and sequence DNA from the air. The presence of human DNA in nearly every sample from the study is “a major hurdle,” Barnes said. On one hand, it encouragingly shows that the detection method is sensitive, Barnes said. But “this could also suggest that airborne samples are particularly easy to contaminate with DNA from the research team, especially when mammals are the target of analysis,” he added.
https://www-livescience-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.livescience.com/amp/dna-collected-air.html
DNA does not exist:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/62gd23/dna_does_not_exist/
The new understanding of DNA that removes the idea of genes.
https://truthseeker.se/the-new-understanding-of-dna-that-removes-the-idea-of-genes
DNA DISCOVERY, EXTRACTION AND STRUCTURE. A CRITICAL REVIEW
DNA: the Double Helix or the Ribbon Helix?
https://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0104v2.pdf?
THE DNA STRUCTURE PUZZLES 1 – 23
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330010773_THE_DNA_STRUCTURE_PUZZLES_1_-_23
DNA is just a theoretical concept. The so-called indirect evidence of the existence and structure of DNA are just completely unsustainable interpretations. No one can prove that the bands of different sizes seen on gel electrophoresis are the expression of the existence of the hypothetical structure of what is claimed to be DNA.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22545-dna-imaged-with-electron-microscope-for-the-first-time
David and James explore how models, like DNA, are created and questioning this process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxEc0WgWrBY
Meyl: Junk DNA no Junk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCzy2O59BE0
DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Scientists Show
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18dna.html
I took 9 different DNA tests and here’s what I found
https://www.livescience.com/amp/63997-dna-ancestry-test-results-explained.html
Twins get ‘mystifying’ DNA ancestry test results
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isa5c1p6aC0
Rosalind Franklin’s contributions to virology
https://naturemicrobiologycommunity.nature.com/posts/18900-rosalind-franklin-s-contributions-to-virology
Genetics: Genome in Dissolution
https://telegra.ph/Genetics-Genome-in-Dissolution-11-01
Lizard comes back Jewish
https://www.tiktok.com/@officialtiktokscience/video/6960025155863055622?lang=en
The Amino Age and The New abNormal Doctors
https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/06/30/the-amino-age-and-the-new-abnormal-doctors/
The genome was considered to be the unchangeable blueprint of the human being, which is determined at the beginning of our life. Science must bid farewell to this idea. In reality, our genetic make-up is in a state of constant change
https://telegra.ph/Genetics-Genome-in-Dissolution-11-01
Crick’s Caduceus: Is DNA another Occult hoax of scientism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2geiVRoImSs
DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09553002.2011.538130
Feel Good Counselling 
